PhD Course

Research Methodology

~9 hours · 3 sessions · 1st-year PhD students

Learn to design sound, crisp research projects. From problem framing to honest reporting.

Course Focus

This course hopes to help design research projects that are methodologically sound, properly scoped, and accurately reported.

1

Problem Definition

Finding the right problem and formulating research questions we can tackle. Framing problems in a way that is both practically useful and scientifically interesting.

2

Scoping & Assumptions

Limiting domain and data types, identifying reasonable assumptions that keep the problem interesting yet manageable.

3

Hypotheses & Experiments

Detailing research questions into experiments and hypotheses with clear falsification criteria.

4

Evaluation & Reporting

Designing credible evaluations, understanding uncertainty, and reporting results honestly.

Pedagogical Rhythm

Think individually Breakout groups Report back Instructor synthesis

Sessions

Session 1 3 hours

Wed 18 March, 12:30–15:30 · Room A107, Povo 1

Tackling a Problem End to End

From motivations to research questions, scoping, state of the art, datasets, evaluation metrics, process. The output is a well-defined, “executable” research problem — at least for the first iteration.

Full Session Details →
Session 2 2h 15m

Thu 19 March, 14:15–16:30 · Room A203, Povo 1

Experimentation & Evaluation

How would you know if you succeeded?

Experiment Design

  • From hypotheses to experiments
  • Hidden degrees of freedom
  • The portfolio problem and winner's curse
  • Exploratory vs confirmatory experiments

Evaluation Pitfalls

  • The evaluation trinity: construct, measurement, credibility
  • Failure modes: leakage, gaming, baseline dressing
  • Intrinsic vs extrinsic evaluation

Ground Truth & Baselines

  • Where does ground truth come from?
  • Baselines as honesty tools
  • Ablations and failure cases
  • Honest reporting and uncertainty

Artifacts

  • Evaluation design worksheet
  • Baseline justification
  • Research design document v1
Session 3 3h 30m

Wed 25 March, 9:00–12:30 · Room A107, Povo 1

Student Presentations

Defend your research design

5-Slide Presentation

Apply the course methodology to your own research (or a topic of your choice).

  • Slide 1: Problem & research questions — what and why it matters
  • Slide 2: Assumptions & scope — what you're NOT addressing
  • Slide 3: Definition of done — when is this "enough" for your PhD?
  • Slide 4: Data & experiments — where data comes from, concrete experiments
  • Slide 5: Next steps, blockers & risks — what you'll do next, what could go wrong, what you don't know yet

Format

  • All students submit a 5-min video recording before the session
  • Selected students also present live in class
  • Peer review: each student reviews ~4 assigned peers' videos
  • "I don't know yet" is a valid, honest answer

Course Synthesis

  • Common strengths and pitfalls across presentations

Artifacts

  • 5-slide presentation + video recording
  • Peer review feedback (given and received)

Course Outcomes

By the end of the course, each student has:

  • A scoped research problem with clear stakeholder context
  • Artifact requirements analysis
  • Clear, answerable research questions
  • Explicit, falsifiable hypotheses with falsification criteria
  • A complete evaluation design (metrics, ground truth, baselines, ablations)
  • A risk and uncertainty analysis
  • A peer-reviewed research methodology plan